Aug 212014
 

It’s been one of those weeks. You know, the really expensive ones that you didn’t see coming. On Monday, our washing machine broke – seems it can’t be fixed and we need a new machine. Two adults, three kids and two muddy dogs in a house with no washing facility.

Then, on Wednesday, the boiler went on the blink and we had no hot water (there is nothing so unfulfilling as a mildly tepid bath and a bath-bomb that just sits, fermenting on the bottom of the bath without a hint of fizz).

So, not only could we not wash our clothes; we couldn’t wash ourselves. Even having to have cold water to wash my hands was an irritant.

These things happen and we are fortunate that we can have them fixed or replaced, but it brings home the fact that you never realise or appreciate  what (or who) you’ve got until it’s gone. You know; like when you get a cold and appreciate breathing.

So, there I was, a bit grumpy and inconvenienced and then something happened that made me snap out of it quicker than a cat having a (tepid) bath; I turned on the news.

If ever you need a big slap of reality, just look at the headlines, and then offer the other cheek and get repeatedly slapped by the horrific stories they are exposing. Beheading, bombs, splintered limbs, disease, landslides, abuse, neglect –  utter misery. I used to turn down the radio in the car for some headlines, to protect my children from this ever-hideous world. Now I just turn it off altogether because all the headlines depict some tragedy or vile act of one human being toward another. Yet, as adults, we cannot ignore it; we must not. The abject horror and suffering many people have to endure is too hard to bear – but they must and so should we. People die in order to make the world aware (I was brought to tears by the statement from James Foley’s parents) and I feel it is our duty to sit up and take notice.

 Change cannot come from ignorance, but from education and action. And hope.

In my last post I spoke about luck; how we can make our own luck, good and bad. I think I need to take that back. It IS luck; a genetic roulette that allowed me to be born in the UK rather than Gaza, that allows my kids to grow up in comfort and shelter rather than squalid refugee camps.

Next time I open my mouth to complain about some small misfortune that has befallen me, I will stop to think and close my safe, healthy, free mouth before remembering how bloody lucky I am.

A Near Miss?

 Blog, Having a bit of a rant  8 Responses »
May 202014
 

I have been having a bit of a rant to anyone who would listen to this week and I thought it only fitting that I should my views to you lovely lot as well.

Last week I read an article that really grabbed me. I am one of the few teachers that actually read the Times Educational Supplement magazine and last week there was an article about how children address men and women differently. I found the article so engaging and clever and pertinent to my feminist tendencies that I ripped it out of the magazine as a keeper. Nobody would have noticed except for the fact that by the next day the story had been picked up by the BBC and (heaven forfend) the Daily Fail.

It basically spoke about the imbalance of the titles ‘Sir’ and ‘Miss’ which are given to teachers at school. Sir coming from sire or being equated with knighthood and Miss being, well, anybody really. It went on to comment that in further education, you get a bachelor of arts degree or a Masters and anybody with any academic seniority is a fellow, all terms which have masculine connotations.

I had never noticed this before and, whilst it has not shaped who I am, it does stress the underlying sexism that is in our society. Something that, if you are not on the receiving end, goes unseen but when you feel the effects of it, it is a deep and stabbing undercurrent in the world that we live in.

It stems to racism too. Again, something I had never thought of but brought to my attention in the book Noughts and Crosses by Malorie Blackman (children’s Laureate). Plasters. By and large all ‘pink’, all ‘skin colour’. But, whose skin?

These little subtleties may go unnoticed and be ‘liveable’ but when it is you they are grazing each day, you they are itching like that label that won’t sit straight, it gets to you. It irritates and it scratches.

Perhaps we need to cut out the label?

May 082014
 

I can’t not write about this, I just can’t.

I have two daughters; in education, loved, precious and free. I have raised my eldest daughter in the tragic shadow of dear Maddie McCann, always fearful, always thankful. Every 3rd May, on the anniversary of Maddie’s abduction, I hold her (just a year younger than Maddie) especially tight and my heart breaks for Gerry and Kate McCann.

Maddie is all over the news again and I thank God for it, for the human determination to find this child.

But now it has happened again. x 234. But this time we know when and where and who. Yet the reaction has been as such you would think it was cattle that had gone missing. It has taken a social media campaign to make the world sit up and listen, to make the world care. How is that possible? There are 234 terrified girls out there, somewhere. Hundreds of mothers and fathers grieving, tortured, lost. Colour of skin, culture, location, politics, religion, NONE of these things changes the fact that these girls, taken because they were being educated, are still missing and were being swept under the media carpet. Why? Why does it have to take a campaign to action a search for them. Are they so disposable?

Did we learn nothing from Malala? She has warned that it will escalate; something must be done, now.

Meanwhile, I think of those terrified girls. Look at the girls in your child’s school – some loud, some quiet, some strong, some weak. The clever ones, the ones with special needs, the ones that skip as they walk, the ones that giggle constantly.

Imagine them all gone, taken to be sold. It’s incomprehensible isn’t it? In our protected, democratic society.

Yet it seems when exactly this happens in some unknown place we turn a blind eye, out of sight out of mind.

Make them headline news, keep them alive. Let your heart break for them.

#BringBackOurGirls

The Social Pescatarian

 Blog, Having a bit of a rant  6 Responses »
Apr 202014
 

I have invented a new label for myself: I am to become a Social Pescatarian.

Let me fill you in thus far:

I have been a vegetarian since my animal ethics course at university. Never much of a carnivore to begin with, it was an easy decision to give up meat altogether and at the time there was little opportunity and even less money to be considering buying organic or free-range meat which would appease my conscience. So I happily gave it up (read more about it here if you like).

So, after 21 years, minus 6 months in Germany (I defy ANYONE to be a successful veggie in a country that sells raw meat in a bun) and about a year after the birth of my third child (more info here if you must) I am being driven into eating fish, albeit socially.

So what heinous thing is driving me to this?  What could possibly make me quash my hardened principles?

Bloody risotto, that’s what.

Let me give you an example of most menus in gastro-pubs up and down the country and most high street kiddie-friendly joints
to boot:

Yep, there you have it. If you are vegetarian, most likely the only option you have is risotto (or salad – purleeease! I’m out for dinner!). Now, I like risotto, but not all the bloody time. I only have to think of carbs and my stomach begins to swell in some peculiar Dahl-like manner. I am the Violet Beauregard of white carbs. And the risotto trend is for spring vegetables (see above) or fancy mushrooms and with risotto, that’s it. No option for triple-cooked chips on the side or champ mash with a masterchef jus, oh no, a large bowl of rice is yours and that is it.

So fed up am I with this being the only option I have recently found myself ordering the fish instead. Fish comes with nice side dishes and fancy sauces (OK, except the menu above where it is still carbtastic) but just look at all the meat dishes! They sound SO much nicer. I had fish today, herb crusted with green vegetables. It felt healthy, it tasted of something, it didn’t leave me feeling like I had filled my stomach with ever-expanding balls of bleached wheat. And, while I’m at it, why is there never a veggie option on the Sunday roasts? Is it so hard to rustle up a bit of nut roast? Stick a bit of quorn in the oven? Not cook the roast potatoes in goose fat?

So, weighing this all up, I have decided to become a social pescatarian. If I go out and it’s risotto I will, without guilt or self-flagellation, allow myself to peruse the fish option and not think about Finding Nemo.

So there. *descends from orange box and leaves Hyde Park*

All a bit scary?

 Blog, Having a bit of a rant  5 Responses »
Oct 312013
 

So, it’s Hallowe’en. For some reason it seems to be my children’s (and many others too) favourite time of the year.  And I have no idea why. It’s not a festival, not a celebration, not a commemorative day….so what exactly is it?  And where did it come from?  Well, I know it is All Hallow’s Eve and all that but when and how did it became what it is today?  According the the oracle that is Wikipedia the idea of dressing up and asking for food/money actually started in Bonnie Scotland!  Who’d have thought it? But it seems we have our American friends to thank for the trick or treating we know today…

Trick or Treat?

I have a HUGE problem with this.  I know, I know, it’s just a bit of fun.  But fun for who? Is it fun for the parents who have to buy/make all the expensive costumes and then, in the chill night air, stalk their children around the nearby streets while they alienate the neighbours for the next 6 months? Is it fun for the neighbours (especially the elderly) who, for the most part, do not want to be harried from their comfy sofa in the middle of their supper or favourite soap to be greeted by a bunch of kids who would otherwise not even bid them good morning?  And then have to give them sweets else they’ll have a trick played on them?  I mean isn’t this just juvenile mugging?  ‘Give us yer sweets or it’ll turn nasty..‘ ‘I demand you give me something for nothing or you will be punished.‘ I mean, what sort of lesson are we trying to teach here? And since when did we tell our kids that taking sweets from strangers is a good thing?

I envisage some of you are now rolling your eyes and thinking ‘shut up, love and it’s just a bit of fun.’ But, like I said, fun for who? Can’t the fun be found elsewhere?

Elsewhere

So, am I anti-Hallowe’en?  No. I can’t say I celebrate its arrival but it means nothing, there is no underlying current of satanic-worship, so no.  Make of it what you will. In our house my kids will be squeezing into previous year’s costumes (stingy here refuses to buy new ones. Costumes retail at about £15. 15 x 3 kids = too expensive. Yes, I could make them but what it will cost in restorative wine after the stress of glue, sellotape, tears and arguing will be just as expensive).  We will be carving pumpkins, apple-bobbing, playing the chocolate game (any excuse) and eating ‘yukky’ food.  Last year’s attempt at dyeing raisins green and passing them off as bogies will NOT be repeated.

I was slightly worried that my son woke us up this morning declaring ‘It’s Hallowe’en’ as if Santa had been…and then my daughter appeared the other side of the bed going ‘Mwa-ha-ha’ while a pair of plastic fangs dropped out of her spittled mouth.

It is half past nine in the morning and all my kids are costumed-up already.

They don’t get it from me…

Mar 082013
 

As today is International Women’s Day, I thought it appropriate to mention a story I found on twitter this week that got my juices flowing, and not in a good way.

Apparently there is now a MILF diet.  Yes, a MILF diet, FFS.  For those of you (and there can’t be many) who don’t know what a MILF is, it is an acronym for Mothers I’d Like to F**k.  Yes, I kid you not.  And someone has actually released a book about how to diet yourself into a woman who needs to change her looks and body in order to attract men who want to shag her.  Not get to know her, find her interesting, attractive, witty…no, no.  F**k her.  Charming isn’t it?  Just the Neanderthal terminology makes me want to scream, let alone the connotation that women are to be judged by their shagability, thus making them sex-objects and nothing else. It’s a bit sinister really.

For me, the MILF is one step on from the ‘Yummy Mummy’ (bleugh) – a term applied to women who after giving birth are, apparently, magically  no longer attractive unless they spend all their time on hair and nails and working out in the gym.  I assume a MILF is all the above but they have a vajazzle while they’re at it? And women strive to be like this, they are media-indoctrinated to believe that having one of the terms applied to them is a compliment.  Don’t get me wrong, we all like to be told we look good or are attractive, of course we do.  And many people use the YM term in a well-meaning way and it should probably be taken as such. But is that really all there is to say?  Is the external so much more important than the internal?  What about what we do, what we say, how we think?

Who is it for?

The article also spoke about how women should simply strive to be the best that they can be, in all areas of life.  Easier said than done, by God I know that.  I would be a hypocrite if I said I hadn’t fallen foul to all the crap we are fed about how we should look, what size we should be.  But it makes a whole lot of sense.  We set our children targets and always stress they must be do-able, attainable otherwise you set yourself up for a fall.  I tell the kids I teach the same – don’t aim to the be in the A team for football if you are just scraping the C team squad.  Aim for the B team, the captain maybe and be content with that.  If only, as women, we could apply the same philosophy to how we look and BELIEVE it.  Truly, deep down in our hearts, actually believe it. By all means wear what you like, be what size you like, wear make-up, don’t wear make-up, wax, vajazzle and have a boob job.  But, for God’s sake, do it for yourself, not for anyone else or for how you think you are supposed to look.

You can read the original article here, I thought it was very good and makes some pertinent observations about modern feminism.  I am also going to point you to another blog post in a similar vein  here.

What are your thoughts?  I’d be interested to hear.

Guilty Conscience

 Blog, Having a bit of a rant  5 Responses »
Nov 172012
 

I felt compelled to write this post after reading what had to say about sticking a pink fluffy rabbit down your cleavage in the name of charity.  It made me remember the rage I felt the other day as I opened a letter from a cancer charity stuffed with a pen, address labels and a car sticker.  My mum used to get bucket loads of this stuff, she was forever offering me another free umbrella that some charity had sent her, or a headscarf to accompany the gazillions of brooches, bracelets, keyrings etc that had been posted to her as a ‘gift’.  OK, so we all know why they do it, to emotionally blackmail us into giving them a donation but is this really what charity is supposed to be?  I am not going to go into the economics of how much it costs to produce this tat and then send it all out.  And where do they get it from?  Is it ethically sourced or are we being forced to support one charity and in doing so supporting the bleak working conditions of the kids that were forced to construct all these umbrellas in some godforsaken factory somewhere?

No, I do not want a pen, address labels, car sticker or christmas cards.

Clearly it is a ploy that works because it has been going on for years.  I remember my grandmother being very pleased with her ‘free’ packs of Christmas cards she got each year, painted with feet or mouth.  But what is charity all about?  For a good rant on buying commercialised stuff to show how supportive you are, go read the post and the comments.  I don’t want to pee on her bonfire and could never say it like she does, but I do feel that she makes some great points.  And I certainly don’t want to criticise anyone who gives to charity – all giving is good and I am in no position to judge anyone else.  However, it makes me livid when, in the privacy of my own house, I am made to feel guilty, nay emotionally blackmailed into feeling I MUST give some money to cover the costs of all the stuff they have sent me.  I will give to charity as I see fit, either by running a race for sponsorship or simply by sticking a fiver in a box.  I will NOT be made to feel I am a bad person by keeping all this gubbings and not signing up for a £2 a month donation.  In Clinton Cards the other day  I was asked if I wanted to buy a pen to support breast cancer? In front of a queue of people I was made to seem either an unfeeling bitch or made to buy a pen I didn’t want. That is NOT FAIR.  I see the pens, thanks.  I don’t want one and if I want to make a donation to cancer awareness I will do so but because I WANT to and not because you make me and not because it makes me look good in front of others.  That, for me, is not what charity is about.

By the way, my answer as to what to do with all the stuff they send is save it up and stuff it in the shoebox appeal.  Not the address labels, obviously.  I am not sure whether the poor families in Romania want a pen that will fit in your wallet, but hopefully they will be more grateful to receive it than I was and at least somewhere in the dubious chain of events there is a use for it all.

Being Ginger

 Blog, Having a bit of a rant  12 Responses »
Mar 162012
 

I am a redhead, a ginger, a carrot-top, a duracell….I’ve heard ‘em all and serenely smiled.  I didn’t when I was a child.  When I was a child, I went from staring at the playground until they went away, crying, cutting all my hair off (bad idea – then I just looked like a boy; but ginger) and finally I told them to bugger off.

I tell you, it’s bloody hard growing up with red hair.  No matter how much my mother told me it was my crowning glory, all I wanted to be was brunette.  And not have glasses.  Or sticky out teeth.  Oh, yes.  God was on a sabbatical the day they made me….but I was lucky.  I had a ginger mother who bought me contact lenses at the young age of thirteen and braces sorted my teeth out.  However, it was the fluorescent 80s and I wept at all the vibrant colours I couldn’t wear.  Once, I thought sod it and bought an orange top and a yellow skirt to wear to my grandparents’ golden wedding party.  People thought it was fancy dress.  That I’d made myself ‘gold’ to celebrate.  My sister just laughed.  But then, she was tall, olive-skinned with long dark hair and an uncanny resemblance to Sade.  I never stood a chance.

In my twenties I just put up with it.  The comments had dried up and my wardrobe was a safe rail of neutrals.  No prints, no patterns, nothing brighter than beige.  Just in case, the feistiness that comes hand-in-hand with my titian tresses had manifested itself and anyone daring to proffer comment would have been shot down in flames.

Then, during my early thirties the ginger jokes seemed to make a comeback.  And who have I got to thank for it?  Yes, another flippin’ redhead! Bloody Catherine Tate came on tele* and satirised society’s ostracising of the ‘gingas’.  Funny, but society, being what it is, took this as an opportunity to resurrect the schoolboy jokes and once more I was subjected to a few ‘hilarious’ one-liners.  I’m a grown woman FFS!  SHUT. UP.

Ironically, these days people keep referring to me as ‘blonde’ and I find myself protesting loudly – I am NOT blonde, I’m a redhead! It’s true, my hair has got much lighter as I’ve got older, but I am definitely not blonde.  And especially not strawberry blonde thank you very much.  My irritation peaked when my third child was born with bright red hair and everyone asked:

‘Where does she get her hair colour from?’

‘ME! ME!  She gets it from ME!’

‘Really? But you’re blonde’

‘ARGHHHH!’

Everyone was at it; the postman, work colleagues, old ladies in the vegetable aisle at Waitrose…only my oldest friends and family seemed to know I was a redhead.  It was a peculiar predicament to be in – suddenly, for the first time in my life, I wanted to be a ginger.  I needed to reclaim my genes.  And I found myself admiring my daughter’s beautiful copper curls.  I would sit and stare with pride, actively liking her red hair and thinking how lucky she was.  And seemingly so does everyone else!  No word of a lie; I have never taken her out without someone commenting favourably about her hair.  ‘Oh, it’s gorgeous!’ ‘You’re so lucky – she’s so beautiful!’ ‘Her hair is stunning’

Perhaps mine was too…….

*I let her off because, in the words of Tim Minchin, “Only a ginger, can call another ginger, ginger.”

 Posted by Sarah Miles at 17:54